J Endocrinol Metab
Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, ISSN 1923-2861 print, 1923-287X online, Open Access
Article copyright, the authors; Journal compilation copyright, J Endocrinol Metab and Elmer Press Inc
Journal website https://www.jofem.org

Original Article

Volume 11, Number 2, April 2021, pages 42-48


The Significance of Insulin Resistance in Nondiabetic Breast Cancer Patients

Berrin Papila Kundaktepea, Sinem Durmusb, Mahir Cengizc, Fatih Orkun Kundakteped, Volkan Sozere, Cigdem Papilaf, Remise Gelisgenb, Hafize Uzunb, g

aDepartment of Surgery, Cerrahpasa Medicine Faculty, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
bDepartment of Medical Biochemistry, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
cDepartment of Internal Medicine, Biruni University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey
dDepartment of Internal Medicine, Gaziosmanpasa Taksim Research and Training Hospital, Istanbul, Turkey
eDepartment of Biochemistry, Yildiz Technical University, Istanbul, Turkey
fDepartment of Internal Medicine, Division of Oncology, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Istanbul, Turkey
gCorresponding Author: Hafize Uzun, Department of Medical Biochemistry, Cerrahpasa Faculty of Medicine, Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa 34303, Istanbul, Turkey

Manuscript submitted February 11, 2021, accepted March 12, 2021, published online April 25, 2021
Short title: Insulin Resistance and Breast Cancer
doi: https://doi.org/10.14740/jem729

Abstract▴Top 

Background: The relationship between insulin resistance (IR) and prognostic factors in breast cancer (BC) in premenopausal (pre-M) and postmenopausal (post-M) women is still controversial. We evaluated the potential association between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), fasting insulin levels (FILs), the homeostasis model assessment index (HOMA), and the prognostic factors of BC in nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors.

Methods: We compared 80 nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors to 60 women with normal mammography as a control.

Results: Age, body mass index (BMI), FBG, and HbA1c did not differ between the groups. FIL (P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (P < 0.001) of the BC group were significantly higher than in the control group. FIL (P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (P < 0.001) of the BC group were significantly higher than in the control group, for both pre- and post-M patients. FIL and HOMA-IR values were found to be significantly higher in the patients with stage IV BC than in other stages of BC. FIL and HOMA-IR are highly specific and sensitive parameters in their ability to diagnose BC.

Conclusions: FIL and HOMA-IR are associated with BC risk in nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors. When BC risk was evaluated according to the stage of menopause, no difference was observed; only the disease stage was significant. FIL and IR may function as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for human cancers.

Keywords: Breast cancer; HbA1c; Fasting blood glucose; Fasting insulin; Insulin resistance

Introduction▴Top 

Breast cancer (BC) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer among women. It is also in the second place among female cancer patients in cancer-related deaths; and mortality rates are expected to increase further in the next decade [1].

Insulin resistance (IR) is a pathologic clinical condition progressing with hyperinsulinemia. Hyperinsulinemia doubles the risk of BC in postmenopausal (post-M) women [2, 3]. IR takes a role in the pathogenesis of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM), obesity, and cancer. Women with IR syndrome characteristics such as obesity, high insulin levels, diabetes, and physical inactivity are at increased risk of BC [4, 5]. It should be noted that insulin is not a parameter indicating the future incidence of BC. However, it is thought that there may be a weak relationship between BC and T2DM [5].

The mechanical relationship between overweight and negative BC is linked to IR and fasting insulin level (FIL)-related pathways. Obesity poses different BC risks in premenopausal (pre-M) and post-M women, depending on estrogen receptor (ER) status [6]. Genetic variants related to IR can affect the risk of BC [7].

Our goal in this research was to clarify the potential relationship between hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c), fasting blood glucose (FBG), FILs, and IR, and the prognostic factors of BC in nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors.

Materials and Methods▴Top 

This was a retrospective case-control study conducted at the Department of General Surgery and the Department of Internal Medicine, approved by the Ethics Committee of Istanbul University-Cerrahpasa, Cerrahpasa Medical Faculty. Eighty consecutive nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors and 60 consecutive age-matched, pre-M and post-M healthy control subjects were enrolled in this research.

All subjects were selected from people of Turkish origin. Pregnant women, patients with renal, hepatic, rheumatic or endocrine diseases were not included in the study. In addition, smokers, those with a history of chronic alcohol consumption, and subjects taking oral antidiabetics such as metformin, dipeptidyl peptidase-4 (DPP-4) inhibitors, glucagon-like peptide-1 (GLP-1) analogues, hepatotoxic drugs (antituberculosis), and subjects taking antiepileptic or oral contraceptive pills were also excluded from the study. For cancer staging, the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification established by the American Joint Cancer Committee (AJCC) was used [8].

Healthy subjects without any endocrine, vascular, cardiac or inflammatory diseases were selected as the control group. None of the subjects has a family history of diabetes. None of the subjects had diabetes or glucose intolerance as confirmed by the oral glucose tolerance test (OGTT).

Anthropometric characteristics (weight, height) of the individuals were recorded. Body mass index (BMI) of the subjects was calculated using the formula: BMI (kg/m2) = weight (kg)/(height (m))2 [9].

Demographic (age, gender) and clinical characteristics of individuals (comorbid conditions, primary tumor size, histological subtype, axillary lymph node involvement, TNM stage, ER or progesterone receptor (PR) status, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 (HER-2) status and histological grade) were obtained from the medical records of individuals.

The dilution was 1/100 for ER (Novocastra, Leica Biosystems, Nussloch, Germany; clone 6F11), 1/75 for PR (Novocastra, Leica Biosystems; clone 312), and 1/80 for HER-2 (Novocastra, Leica Biosystems; clone CB11).

Blood samples were taken from the participants before surgery. After an overnight fasting, they were taken into tubes containing anticoagulant (ethylenediamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA)) and tubes without anticoagulant. Immediately after venous blood collection, blood samples were centrifuged at 4 °C for 10 min (3,000 g) and plasma and serum were obtained. Glucose levels were determined by enzymatic methods (Abbott Diagnostics, Abbott Park, IL, USA). FIL were measured by an electrochemiluminescence immunoassay (ECLIA) method on a Roche-Hitachi E170. HbA1c levels were assessed by high performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) (Bio-Rad Variant 2 Turbo). All biochemical parameters were obtained from the patients’ medical records.

FBG and FIL were measured in subjects, and these values were used to determine the degree of IR in conjunction with homeostasis model assessment (HOMA). HOMA-IR was calculated using the following formula: HOMA-IR = (FBG (mg/dL) × FIL (µU/mL))/405 [10].

Statistical analysis

Distribution was tested using the single sample Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. Categorical variables were presented as the frequency and percentage and analyzed by using Chi-square test. Numerical variables were expressed as mean ± standard deviation and analyzed by using two-sided Student’s t- test. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed. Statistical significance limit was accepted as 0.05. Analyzes were performed using SPSS 20.0 software for Windows (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA).

Results▴Top 

The demographic data and laboratory findings of the studied groups are shown in Table 1. Age, BMI, FBG, and HbA1c did not differ among the groups. FIL (P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (P < 0.001) levels of the BC group were significantly higher than controls. In addition, Table 1 displays also the frequency of BC patients belonging to TNM, ER status, PR status, HER-2/neu status, and molecular subtype’s classification.

Table 1.
Click to view
Table 1. Demographic and Biochemical Parameters of the Groups
 

In Table 2, each of the BC and control groups is divided into pre-M and post-M subgroups. When the demographic and biochemical data for these subgroups were compared, age difference was found between pre-M and pre-M control individuals (P < 0.001). The age of post-M BC patients was significantly higher than that of the pre-M BC group (P < 0.001). FIL and HOMA-IR values of pre-M BC patients were statistically significantly higher than those of pre-M control individuals (each P < 0.001); likewise, FIL and HOMA-IR values of post-M BC patients were found to be statistically significantly higher than those of post-M control individuals (each P < 0.001).

Table 2.
Click to view
Table 2. Demographic and Biochemical Parameters of the Groups for Menopause
 

The ROC analysis results of FIL, FBG, HbA1c, and HOMA-IR levels for BC versus control are compared in Table 3. FIL and HOMA-IR had AUC values of 0.987 (sensitivity 98.8%, specificity 82.7%, and cutoff 8.5) and 0.998 (sensitivity 97.5%, specificity 96.7%, and cutoff 2.4), respectively, which demonstrates their sufficiency in distinguishing BC from control.

Table 3.
Click to view
Table 3. Sensitivity, Specificity, AUC, Cutoff, and Asymptotic Significance of Parameters in Study Groups (Control vs. Breast Cancer)
 

FIL (P < 0.001) and HOMA-IR (P < 0.001) levels of BC group according to TNM stage were significantly higher in the stage IV group (Table 4). A re-analysis of the biochemical parameters of ER, PR, and HER-2 in the BC subgroups revealed no change in the statistical significance of FIL and HOMA-IR (Table 5).

Table 4.
Click to view
Table 4. Biochemical Parameters of the Breast Cancer Group for TNM Stage
 

Table 5.
Click to view
Table 5. Biochemical Parameters of the Breast Cancer Group for ER, PR and HER-2
 
Discussion▴Top 

IR is often overlooked because it is not classified as a disease. This study provides evidence that FIL and IR estimated using the HOMA were increased in nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors. When FIL and IR were evaluated according to the stage of menopause, no difference was found; it was the disease stage that was significant. FIL and HOMA-IR had a sensitivity of 98.8% and specificity of 82.7%, and a sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.7%, respectively, which demonstrates their sufficiency in distinguishing BC from healthy subjects. IR plays an important role in FIL homeostasis related to cancer.

It is known that IR, which is considered as the primary factor in metabolic syndrome mechanisms, also increases the risk of cardiovascular disease (CVD). IR is a key player in the pathogenesis of metabolic diseases and can be observed in several clinical conditions such as BC [11, 12]. The causative association between BC and IR is also controversial [13]. Ferroni et al [14] reported that it showed increased pretreatment FBG and FIL in nondiabetic women with BC; although the higher pretreatment levels were not pathological, they resulted in higher HOMA indexes. In a meta-analysis, Hernandez et al [15] reported that they could not find any change in IR markers in BC patients. Since both factors are directly related to IR and BC, these studies may be biased by incorrect patient stratification in terms of BMI and menopausal status [15].

In our study, BMI, FBG, and HbA1c concentrations did not differ between patients and control subjects, nor did FIL, FBG, HbA1c, or HOMA-IR differ between the pre-M and post-M BC groups. No relation was found between FIL and IR and prognostic factors, such as ER, PR, and HER-2, in nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors. Brown et al [16] showed that FBG levels and HOMA-IR scores were higher in post-M women than in pre-M women. Luque et al [13] found that BC presence is associated with IR in overweight or obese pre-M women but not in pre-M or post-M women of normal weight. Tumor and IR markers are associated with impaired glucose/insulin metabolism in overweight or obese pre-M BC patients. This indicates a bidirectional relationship between irregular or unbalanced glucose/insulin metabolism data and BC. Yadav et al [17] noted significant differences in the HbA1c level, FIL, and C-peptide concentration of pre-M women between cases and controls. Insignificant results were found for FBG and BMI. Similarly, significant differences in FBG, FIL, C-peptide concentration, and HbA1c level were observed in post-M patients and controls. Similarly to our study, Manjer et al [18] found no significant differences in BC risk for perimenopausal (peri-M) and post-M women from different BMI quartiles and FBG levels. The association between BC presence and IR was independently influenced by BMI, ER, PR, and HER-2 in nondiabetic peri-M and post-M women. The role of FIL, FBG, and IR as markers for the diagnosis of BC in peri-M and post-M women must be widely evaluated.

Insulin has been shown to stimulate cell proliferation in normal breast tissue and human BC cell lines [19, 20], and to enhance breast tumor growth in animal models [21, 22]. Insulin growth factors (IGF) and IGF binding proteins (IGFBP) are valuable factors for work as well as FIL. It is emphasized that IGF1 and IGF1/IGFBP3 ratios may be parameters associated with mammographic density and the risk of BC development [23, 24]. IGF1, released by adipocytes and regulated by glucose and fatty acids, has been reported to play a role in the control of cancer cell growth in obese individuals [25]. IGF1 concentrations and sex steroids and plasma sex hormone binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations are thought to be factors that may explain this association between cancer and obesity [26]. Clinical studies have also shown an association between hyperinsulinemia, IR and SHBG [27-29]. Insulin and IGF1 inhibit the hepatic synthesis of SHBG. By reducing SHBG levels, insulin exerts a positive effect on estrogen bioavailability, thereby increasing BC risk [30]. In our study, FIL and HOMA-IR of the BC group were significantly higher than those of the control group. FIL and HOMA-IR of the BC group according to TNM stage were significantly higher in the stage IV group than in the other stages. FIL and HOMA-IR had a sensitivity of 98.8% and specificity of 82.7%, and a sensitivity of 97.5% and specificity of 96.7%, respectively, which demonstrates their sufficiency in distinguishing BC from control. The results of our study were consistent with some other studies [2, 3, 31-33]. However, some results in the literature are contradictory. No consistent association was found between FIL and BC [5, 34-35]. Del Giudice et al [31] found that FIL and IGFBP-3 levels were elevated in women with pre-M BC, regardless of diet and other known risk factors for BC. This finding may indicate the presence of an underlying IR syndrome independent of obesity. Gunter et al [3] stated that hyperinsulinemia is an independent risk factor for BC and may be the basis for explaining the relationship between obesity and BC. Jernstrom et al [34] reported that proinsulin, FIL and C-peptide levels were positively correlated with current weight and weight gain, but these hormones and IGF1 levels did not differ between women with and without BC. Past estrogen replacement therapy (ERT) was more common among women with BC and the duration of use was longer. It has been emphasized that the risk of BC increases significantly in women who gain weight or use hormone replacement therapy (HRT), but this increased risk is not related to circulating levels of IGF1, FIL, proinsulin or C-peptide. Kaaks et al [35] reported that there was no clear relationship between BC risk and FIL. Mink et al [5] reported that FIL do not predict future incidence of BC, but may be weakly associated with T2DM, perhaps modulated through increased adiposity. Given these conflicting results, the effects of insulin on BC need to be further investigated [36].

In one study conducted in 2020, Pan et al [37] found that increased IR in post-M women is associated with higher BC incidence and higher all-cause mortality after BC. Another study found that IR may have a negative effect on pathological complete response following neoadjuvant therapy particularly with hormone-positive and HER-2-negative cases of nondiabetic BC [38]. Despite all speculation, Yee et al [39] recommended that oncologists care about insulin because of “Given the important role insulin signaling plays in driving signaling pathways that promote aggressive cancer biology, more attention should be paid by cancer physicians to screening and treating IR.”

The outcomes of this research suggest that insulin may be one of the contributing factors (excluding obesity) to the development of BC. A high FIL is a potential risk factor for BC development in nondiabetic women. IR is an interrupted state in the biological response to insulin in nondiabetic patients with pre-M and post-M breast tumors. Because insulin may affect BC risk and prognosis, it is important to control IR. Considering that the insulin signal activates the signaling pathways in cancer biology, the treatment of IR with medical and integrative approaches may be useful in cancer treatment. FIL and IR may function as potential biomarkers and therapeutic targets for human cancers, and their role should be further studied to improve our understanding of BC pathogenesis and progression.

Acknowledgments

None to declare.

Financial Disclosure

None to declare.

Conflict of Interest

None to declare.

Informed Consent

Written informed consent was obtained from each subject after they were informed about the study.

Author Contributions

BPK, CP, RG, and HU contributed to the conception and interpretation of the data. SD, MC, and VS performed the statistical analysis. BPK, SD, FOK, CP, RG, and HU were involved in writing, reviewing, and editing the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Data Availability

The data supporting the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.


References▴Top 
  1. Greaney ML, Sprunck-Harrild K, Ruddy KJ, Ligibel J, Barry WT, Baker E, Meyer M, et al. Study protocol for Young & Strong: a cluster randomized design to increase attention to unique issues faced by young women with newly diagnosed breast cancer. BMC Public Health. 2015;15:37.
    doi pubmed
  2. Kabat GC, Kim M, Caan BJ, Chlebowski RT, Gunter MJ, Ho GY, Rodriguez BL, et al. Repeated measures of serum glucose and insulin in relation to postmenopausal breast cancer. Int J Cancer. 2009;125(11):2704-2710.
    doi pubmed
  3. Gunter MJ, Hoover DR, Yu H, Wassertheil-Smoller S, Rohan TE, Manson JE, Li J, et al. Insulin, insulin-like growth factor-I, and risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009;101(1):48-60.
    doi pubmed
  4. Goodwin PJ. Insulin resistance in breast cancer: relevance and clinical implications. Breast Cancer Research. 2011;13(2):1-9.
    doi
  5. Mink PJ, Shahar E, Rosamond WD, Alberg AJ, Folsom AR. Serum insulin and glucose levels and breast cancer incidence: the atherosclerosis risk in communities study. Am J Epidemiol. 2002;156(4):349-352.
    doi pubmed
  6. Picon-Ruiz M, Morata-Tarifa C, Valle-Goffin JJ, Friedman ER, Slingerland JM. Obesity and adverse breast cancer risk and outcome: Mechanistic insights and strategies for intervention. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(5):378-397.
    doi pubmed
  7. Jung SY, Papp JC, Sobel EM, Yu H, Zhang ZF. Breast Cancer Risk and Insulin Resistance: Post Genome-Wide Gene-Environment Interaction Study Using a Random Survival Forest. Cancer Res. 2019;79(10):2784-2794.
    doi pubmed
  8. Giuliano AE, Connolly JL, Edge SB, Mittendorf EA, Rugo HS, Solin LJ, Weaver DL, et al. Breast Cancer-Major changes in the American Joint Committee on Cancer eighth edition cancer staging manual. CA Cancer J Clin. 2017;67(4):290-303.
    doi pubmed
  9. World Health Organization. WHO mean body mass index (BMI). Retrieved February 5, 2019.
  10. Matthews DR, Hosker JP, Rudenski AS, Naylor BA, Treacher DF, Turner RC. Homeostasis model assessment: insulin resistance and beta-cell function from fasting plasma glucose and insulin concentrations in man. Diabetologia. 1985;28(7):412-419.
    doi pubmed
  11. Sieri S, Muti P, Claudia A, Berrino F, Pala V, Grioni S, Abagnato CA, et al. Prospective study on the role of glucose metabolism in breast cancer occurrence. Int J Cancer. 2012;130(4):921-929.
    doi pubmed
  12. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Bahl M, Fantus IG, Pritchard KI, Trudeau ME, Koo J, et al. High insulin levels in newly diagnosed breast cancer patients reflect underlying insulin resistance and are associated with components of the insulin resistance syndrome. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 2009;114(3):517-525.
    doi pubmed
  13. Luque RM, Lopez-Sanchez LM, Villa-Osaba A, Luque IM, Santos-Romero AL, Yubero-Serrano EM, Cara-Garcia M, et al. Breast cancer is associated to impaired glucose/insulin homeostasis in premenopausal obese/overweight patients. Oncotarget. 2017;8(46):81462-81474.
    doi pubmed
  14. Ferroni P, Riondino S, Laudisi A, Portarena I, Formica V, Alessandroni J, D'Alessandro R, et al. Pretreatment Insulin Levels as a Prognostic Factor for Breast Cancer Progression. Oncologist. 2016;21(9):1041-1049.
    doi pubmed
  15. Hernandez AV, Guarnizo M, Miranda Y, Pasupuleti V, Deshpande A, Paico S, Lenti H, et al. Association between insulin resistance and breast carcinoma: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e99317.
    doi pubmed
  16. Brown KA, Iyengar NM, Zhou XK, Gucalp A, Subbaramaiah K, Wang H, Giri DD, et al. Menopause Is a Determinant of Breast Aromatase Expression and Its Associations With BMI, Inflammation, and Systemic Markers. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2017;102(5):1692-1701.
    doi pubmed
  17. Yadav NK, Poudel B, Thanpari C, Chandra Koner B. Assessment of biochemical profiles in premenopausal and postmenopausal women with breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2012;13(7):3385-3388.
    doi pubmed
  18. Manjer J, Kaaks R, Riboli E, Berglund G. Risk of breast cancer in relation to anthropometry, blood pressure, blood lipids and glucose metabolism: a prospective study within the Malmo Preventive Project. Eur J Cancer Prev. 2001;10(1):33-42.
    doi pubmed
  19. Ish-Shalom D, Christoffersen CT, Vorwerk P, Sacerdoti-Sierra N, Shymko RM, Naor D, De Meyts P. Mitogenic properties of insulin and insulin analogues mediated by the insulin receptor. Diabetologia. 1997;40(Suppl 2):S25-31.
    doi pubmed
  20. Chappell J, Leitner JW, Solomon S, Golovchenko I, Goalstone ML, Draznin B. Effect of insulin on cell cycle progression in MCF-7 breast cancer cells. Direct and potentiating influence. J Biol Chem. 2001;276(41):38023-38028.
    doi pubmed
  21. Shafie SM, Grantham FH. Role of hormones in the growth and regression of human breast cancer cells (MCF-7) transplanted into athymic nude mice. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1981;67(1):51-56.
  22. Shafie SM, Hilf R. Insulin receptor levels and magnitude of insulin-induced responses in 7,12-dimethylbenz(a)anthracene-induced mammary tumors in rats. Cancer Res. 1981;41(3):826-829.
  23. Campagnoli C, Biglia N, Belforte P, Botta D, Pedrini E, Sismondi P. Post-menopausal breast cancer risk: oral estrogen treatment and abdominal obesity induce opposite changes in possibly important biological variables. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 1992;13(2):139-154.
  24. Byrne C, Colditz GA, Willett WC, Speizer FE, Pollak M, Hankinson SE. Plasma insulin-like growth factor (IGF) I, IGF-binding protein 3, and mammographic density. Cancer Res. 2000;60(14):3744-3748.
  25. D'Esposito V, Passaretti F, Hammarstedt A, Liguoro D, Terracciano D, Molea G, Canta L, et al. Adipocyte-released insulin-like growth factor-1 is regulated by glucose and fatty acids and controls breast cancer cell growth in vitro. Diabetologia. 2012;55(10):2811-2822.
    doi pubmed
  26. Holly J. Insulin-like growth factor-1 and risk of breast cancer. Lancet. 1998;352(9137):1388.
    doi
  27. Nestler JE. Sex hormone-binding globulin: a marker for hyperinsulinemia and/or insulin resistance? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1993;76(2):273-274.
    doi pubmed
  28. Kalme T, Koistinen H, Loukovaara M, Koistinen R, Leinonen P. Comparative studies on the regulation of insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-1 (IGFBP-1) and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) production by insulin and insulin-like growth factors in human hepatoma cells. J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 2003;86(2):197-200.
    doi
  29. Lonning PE, Helle SI, Johannessen DC, Adlercreutz H, Lien EA, Tally M, Ekse D, et al. Relations between sex hormones, sex hormone binding globulin, insulin-like growth factor-I and insulin-like growth factor binding protein-1 in post-menopausal breast cancer patients. Clin Endocrinol (Oxf). 1995;42(1):23-30.
    doi pubmed
  30. Arcidiacono B, Iiritano S, Nocera A, Possidente K, Nevolo MT, Ventura V, Foti D, et al. Insulin resistance and cancer risk: an overview of the pathogenetic mechanisms. Exp Diabetes Res. 2012;2012:789174.
    doi pubmed
  31. Del Giudice ME, Fantus IG, Ezzat S, McKeown-Eyssen G, Page D, Goodwin PJ. Insulin and related factors in premenopausal breast cancer risk. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1998;47(2):111-120.
    doi pubmed
  32. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau ME, Koo J, Madarnas Y, Hartwick W, et al. Fasting insulin and outcome in early-stage breast cancer: results of a prospective cohort study. J Clin Oncol. 2002;20(1):42-51.
    doi pubmed
  33. Goodwin PJ, Ennis M, Pritchard KI, Trudeau ME, Koo J, Taylor SK, Hood N. Insulin- and obesity-related variables in early-stage breast cancer: correlations and time course of prognostic associations. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30(2):164-171.
    doi pubmed
  34. Jernstrom H, Barrett-Connor E. Obesity, weight change, fasting insulin, proinsulin, C-peptide, and insulin-like growth factor-1 levels in women with and without breast cancer: the Rancho Bernardo Study. J Womens Health Gend Based Med. 1999;8(10):1265-1272.
    doi pubmed
  35. Kaaks R, Lundin E, Rinaldi S, Manjer J, Biessy C, Soderberg S, Lenner P, et al. Prospective study of IGF-I, IGF-binding proteins, and breast cancer risk, in northern and southern Sweden. Cancer Causes Control. 2002;13(4):307-316.
    doi pubmed
  36. Minatoya M, Kutomi G, Asakura S, Otokozawa S, Sugiyama Y, Nagata Y, Mori M, et al. Equol, adiponectin, insulin levels and risk of breast cancer. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2013;14(4):2191-2199.
    doi pubmed
  37. Pan K, Chlebowski RT, Mortimer JE, Gunter MJ, Rohan T, Vitolins MZ, Adams-Campbell LL, et al. Insulin resistance and breast cancer incidence and mortality in postmenopausal women in the Women's Health Initiative. Cancer. 2020;126(16):3638-3647.
    doi pubmed
  38. Alan O, Akin Telli T, Aktas B, Koca S, Okten IN, Hasanov R, Basoglu T, et al. Is insulin resistance a predictor for complete response in breast cancer patients who underwent neoadjuvant treatment? World J Surg Oncol. 2020;18(1):242.
    doi pubmed
  39. Yee LD, Mortimer JE, Natarajan R, Dietze EC, Seewaldt VL. Metabolic health, insulin, and breast cancer: why oncologists should care about insulin. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:58.
    doi pubmed


This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.


Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism is published by Elmer Press Inc.

 

Browse  Journals  

 

Journal of Clinical Medicine Research

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism

Journal of Clinical Gynecology and Obstetrics

 

World Journal of Oncology

Gastroenterology Research

Journal of Hematology

 

Journal of Medical Cases

Journal of Current Surgery

Clinical Infection and Immunity

 

Cardiology Research

World Journal of Nephrology and Urology

Cellular and Molecular Medicine Research

 

Journal of Neurology Research

International Journal of Clinical Pediatrics

 

 
       
 

Journal of Endocrinology and Metabolism, bimonthly, ISSN 1923-2861 (print), 1923-287X (online), published by Elmer Press Inc.                     
The content of this site is intended for health care professionals.
This is an open-access journal distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits unrestricted
non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
Creative Commons Attribution license (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International CC-BY-NC 4.0)


This journal follows the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) recommendations for manuscripts submitted to biomedical journals,
the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) guidelines, and the Principles of Transparency and Best Practice in Scholarly Publishing.

website: www.jofem.org   editorial contact: editor@jofem.org
Address: 9225 Leslie Street, Suite 201, Richmond Hill, Ontario, L4B 3H6, Canada

© Elmer Press Inc. All Rights Reserved.